Join The Discussion

 

UPDATE: Could American Airlines move its headquarters?

A key linchpin in the Fort Worth economy, American Airlines Group Inc., is considering sites for a new headquarters, possibly outside the city, the airline’s CEO said this morning.

read more >

Crestwood area hoping to block planned office building

Residents of West Fort Worth’s Crestwood Association are trying to block the rezoning of a small apartment complex at White Settlement Road and North Bailey Avenue to make way for a planned office building, saying it would represent the start of commercial encroachment into their neighborhood.

read more >

Tiger Woods takes a swing at Fort Worth's Dan Jenkins - in print anyway

Rarely does Golf Digest make the news. Leave it to Dan Jenkins to change that.

read more >

Great Women of Texas honored

The Fort Worth Business Press held the Great Women of Texas event Wednesday night at the Omni Fort Worth Hotel. Stacie McDavid of McDavid Investments was honored as the

read more >

Grocers, retailers flocking to Southlake

With its economic development engine revving at full throttle, Southlake is about to welcome several major retail and commercial projects that underscore its image

read more >

F-35's operating cost estimate to decline, Kendall says

Tony Capaccio
(c) 2014, Bloomberg News


WASHINGTON — The Pentagon will decrease its $1.1 trillion estimate for the cost of supporting Lockheed Martin's F-35 fighter jet over a 55-year lifespan, the top U.S. weapons buyer said Thursday.

"It will drop to a number that's not trivial but is not as much" a reduction "as I would like," Frank Kendall, the Defense Department's undersecretary for acquisition, said at a Bloomberg Government breakfast in Washington.

While debate over the aircraft, the costliest U.S. weapons system, has focused mostly on the price to develop and build the fighter, Pentagon agencies also have disputed its longterm operating costs, from spare parts to repairs.

Kendall declined to elaborate on the reduced 55-year estimate by the department's independent cost-assessment office, which will be released later this month in its next unclassified Selected Acquisition Report. Until then, the official projection is the $1.1 trillion formulated by that office three years ago.

By contrast, the Pentagon's F-35 program office estimates that the fleet will cost $857 billion to operate and support over its lifetime.

On the separate cost of developing and producing a planned fleet of 2,443 F-35s, the U.S. Government Accountability Office said in February that its projection is $390.4 billion, as adjusted for inflation over the years the plane is produced. The Pentagon's latest estimate by the same measure is $391.2 billion, about a 1.1 percent reduction from an earlier calculation.

That's still a 68 percent increase from a 2001 estimate the included 409 more planes.

"It's frustrating to me that eight years into production we still have a fair amount of development to go, and I don't want people to lose focus on that," Kendall said today. Kendall has previously described the simultaneous development and production of the F-35 as "acquisition malpractice."

Kendall said that his focus is on insuring that Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed, the biggest U.S. contractor, continues to lower production costs.

Before the award of an eighth production contract, "I want to see specific progress," working with the F-35 program office to identify some milestones "that will give us an indicator of where we are."

Kendall said he also wants to see "active progress" on the next version of software the Marine Corps needs to declare operational its first F-35 models by July 2015 as well as a final version of war-fighting software. "We still have a lot of work to do," he said.

Progress on software testing and structural durability for the Marines' F-35B model "will factor into the details" on the eighth contract, which may include actions that Lockheed must complete in order to received increased orders, he said.

< back

Email   email
hide
Midterms
What was the message of the midterm elections?